<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AvailAgility &#187; Swarming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://availagility.co.uk/tag/swarming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://availagility.co.uk</link>
	<description>Karl Scotland - Using Agile to Deliver Value</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Model workflow stages &#8211; not people or roles</title>
		<link>http://availagility.co.uk/2009/01/25/model-workflow-stages-not-people-or-roles/</link>
		<comments>http://availagility.co.uk/2009/01/25/model-workflow-stages-not-people-or-roles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl Scotland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kanban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swarming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://availagility.wordpress.com/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent discussion on the leanagile list compared Scrum and Kanban with respect to team swarming.  The suggestion was that swarming doesn&#8217;t occur in kanban due to the way work flows from role to another.  This is a common misconception, leading to the perception that kanban is more like waterfall than agile.  Here&#8217;s my response. <a href="http://availagility.co.uk/2009/01/25/model-workflow-stages-not-people-or-roles/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent discussion on the <a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/leanagile/" target="_blank">leanagile</a> list compared Scrum and Kanban with respect to team swarming.  The suggestion was that swarming doesn&#8217;t occur in kanban due to the way work flows from role to another.  This is a common misconception, leading to the perception that kanban is more like waterfall than agile.  Here&#8217;s my response.</p>
<p>Firstly:</p>
<blockquote><p>I would say that limiting WIP in a kanban system can encourage swarming because team members have to help each other rather than pick up new work</p></blockquote>
<p>And then:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align:left;">The stages in a workflow are not people, or even roles.  Just stages.  So anyone can do them.<br />
It just happens that people tend to specialise their roles to stages.<br />
So kanban allows specialisation, but also encourages people to break out of their specialisation by limiting WIP.</p>
<p>For example, I might have an analysis stage, and Bob, a Business Analysis specialist.<br />
If the kanban system has throttled analysis work, Bob could probably work with developers or testers to help them improve their productivity.<br />
And vice versa.</p></blockquote>
<p>Its this focus on workflow, while allowing for specialisation, that means that <a href="http://availagility.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/is-kanban-only-suitable-for-mature-teams/" target="_self">kanban is a suitable technique for teams of all agile maturity</a>.  As teams learn to swarm, then their agility should improve as a result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://availagility.co.uk/2009/01/25/model-workflow-stages-not-people-or-roles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

