Karl Scotland – Using Agile to Deliver Value
A Kanban Sidebar – Take 2
Back in January, I wrote a Kanban Sidebar for an upcoming book on Agile Coaching by Rachel Davies and Liz Sedley. The book is now out in beta, and I have updated the sidebar as part of the review process. I found it interesting to see how my thinking has evolved over the last few months.
A Kanban System for Software Development focuses on visualising work as it flows through various stages of transformation in a value stream, with limits on work in progress at each point. This enables a team to see bottlenecks and constraints in the system such that they can continually strive to improve the system and increase productivity and performance.
This focus on flow renders task estimates unnecessary, making task breakdown an analysis and design activity. Prioritisation, planning and releasing still occur regularly, forming a natural cadence around each activity. The team no longer estimates what it will deliver within a time-box, instead forecasting how much will be delivered from known cycle-time and throughput information.
A team setting a limit of three features being in progress at a time will concentrate on maximising the flow of those features to completion, while deferring time spent on new features until they have spare capacity. The prioritisation, analysis and planning of new work is therefore triggered “Just In Time”, as opposed to being scheduled with an iteration planning meeting. Prioritisation is based on the teams previous capability to deliver features, weighed against future business goals and objectives.
Kanban is the Japanese word for “visual card” and was the name given to the tool used to operate the Toyota Production System. A Kanban System for Software Development will often use an index card as the kanban token limiting work in progress, and a token might represent a unit of value such as a User Story. A Kanban System is, therefore, able to manage the flow of single pieces of customer value through the development system from idea to release.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Karl on June 22, 2009 at 8:21 pm, and is filed under Agile. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
A Pattern for Using Scrum and Kanban
about 1 month ago - 5 comments
I’ve noticed a pattern that I’ve found myself using recently when I’ve worked with new teams that makes use of both Scrum and Kanban ideas. I’ve already said that I believe the two are complimentary, and this should help show how. I’ll often begin with a “Canonical Scrum” implementation. This gives a relatively simple introduction More >
Does A Kanban System Eschew Estimation?
about 1 month ago - 5 comments
I was recently involved in a brief twitter conversation which started when Mike Sutton tweeted: estimation is not about the number that pops out. It is about exploring effort and discovering that you don’t know stuff. Paul Dyson responded: spot on! This is fundamentally what I don’t like about the kanban “if people find estimation More >
Aspects of Kanban in Methods and Tools
about 2 months ago - 1 comment
I wrote an article on “Aspects of Kanban” which has just been published in the Summer 2010 issue of Methods and Tools magazine. Download it, have read, and let me know what you think! Alternatively, there is now an html version available.
Kanban and Scrum – Intention and Implementation
about 2 months ago - 3 comments
In my last post I introduced the idea of a PVC System – one which exemplifies Pull, Value and Capability – and closed by posing the question as to whether Scrum could be considered to be a PVC System. In answering that question myself, I realised that there is another distinction which I will describe More >
Facilitating A Kanban Konversation
about 5 months ago - 2 comments
As I mentioned in my Scrum Gathering Musings, I came up with a twist on the Goldfish Bowl format which I used during the Kanban Exploration Deep Dive. Here are some more details. The Goldfish Bowl format works really well for facilitating a focussed discussion with a large number of people. It keeps the active More >
Process Safeguards and Ski Slopes
about 7 months ago - 11 comments
One of the joys of working as a coach for EMC Consulting are the regular opportunities to have deep conversations on various topics with my colleagues when we are in the office together. For example, earlier this week myself and Simon Bennett began to discuss way of talking to our clients about process such that More >
Kanban Trail Markers
about 9 months ago - 2 comments
When talking about Kanban Systems for Software Development, I always try to emphasis that the Kanban System is more than the tool, and is a System that should be owned by the team, rather than being imposed upon it. By owning it, and being part of creating it, a team are more likely to evolve More >
Outcomes and Sync Steps
about 10 months ago - 4 comments
I met up with Jean Tabaka last week for a coffee and we chatted over various things, including Lean, Kanban, “The Don”, Tufte, and Systems Thinking. One of the other areas was around the origins and original intents of Scrum. Jean mentioned an early paper(*) by Jeff Sutherland, written before the current terminology became standard, More >
Is Kanban A Relabeling of Scrum?
about 10 months ago - 17 comments
Firstly, this post is not an attempt to be divisive or competitive. Instead it is meant to be exploratory. What would it mean for the statement in the title to be true? Actually, the full statement was “People have so misunderstood Scrum, that they’ve reinvented it and called it Kanban”. It was made by Jim More >
5 Steps to Kanban in Cambridge
about 10 months ago - No comments
I’ll be talking about 5 Steps to Kanban at Software East on November 19th. From the website: This event will take place at Red Gate Software, Newnham House, Cambridge Business Park. See the location map for Red Gate Software. BOOK NOW for this event. Tickets (including light buffet) £15 if booked on or before 16th More >







about 1 year ago
Sweet sidebar. There are plenty of ways of tripping up whilst explaining Kanban, in my experience [reading such things]. I don’t like the “therefore”, and I perhaps the last sentence should become a new paragraph. Blimey, check me out, wittering on. Good luck with your contribution mate.