Comments on: Kanban and the New New Product Development Game http://availagility.co.uk/2008/11/26/kanban-and-the-new-new-product-development-game/ Karl Scotland - Using Agile to Deliver Value Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:33:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: MMF driven sprints in a Kanban world | Yeret on Agile/Kanban http://availagility.co.uk/2008/11/26/kanban-and-the-new-new-product-development-game/comment-page-1/#comment-13197 MMF driven sprints in a Kanban world | Yeret on Agile/Kanban Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:17:48 +0000 http://availagility.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-13197 [...] that Scrum Type C is quite similar to what we are discussing. And I also came (again) across Kanban and the New New Product Development Game | AvailAgility which discusses MMFs and Scrum Type C and talks more or less about our direction [...] [...] that Scrum Type C is quite similar to what we are discussing. And I also came (again) across Kanban and the New New Product Development Game | AvailAgility which discusses MMFs and Scrum Type C and talks more or less about our direction [...]

]]> By: New Product Development | Internet Marketing Strategies-Wholesale Electronics http://availagility.co.uk/2008/11/26/kanban-and-the-new-new-product-development-game/comment-page-1/#comment-556 New Product Development | Internet Marketing Strategies-Wholesale Electronics Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:31:05 +0000 http://availagility.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-556 [...] Kanban and the New New Product Development Game « AvailAgility [...] [...] Kanban and the New New Product Development Game « AvailAgility [...]

]]> By: Corey Ladas http://availagility.co.uk/2008/11/26/kanban-and-the-new-new-product-development-game/comment-page-1/#comment-64 Corey Ladas Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:44:00 +0000 http://availagility.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-64 That is too awesome. It's been so long that I read that paper that I forgot how much bullshit had been added by the CSM crowd. No timeboxes. No Scrummasters. Overlapping phases. "Division of labor works well in a Type A system." That is too awesome. It’s been so long that I read that paper that I forgot how much bullshit had been added by the CSM crowd.

No timeboxes. No Scrummasters. Overlapping phases. “Division of labor works well in a Type A system.”

]]>